Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/No Pork No Lard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Islam in Singapore. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:19, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No Pork No Lard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
seems like a neologism to me. Prod removed and 2 unreliable sources added. Ridernyc (talk) 17:40, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or redirect to Halal. Hairhorn (talk) 18:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to MUIS. It seems that these signs are only common in Singapore, since that's all that comes up. Gigs (talk) 18:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Muslims don't eat pork and that's covered in Religious restrictions on the consumption of pork and Islamic dietary laws. This article covers one sign that says they don't serve pork, what's the point? -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 18:31, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- These signs are apparently somewhat controversial since they imply that even though the eatery isn't certified, that it's OK for Muslims to eat there. I don't see major news coverage though (at least not in english), it seems to be a local issue in Singapore among the strictly religious. Gigs (talk) 18:44, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: unreliable sources WP:RS. South Bay (talk) 21:52, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 01:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 01:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Islam in Singapore, as it seems to be an issue solely in Singapore. I rewrote the article with some reliable sources instead of random webforums. But there's not really enough coverage to meet WP:N. cab (talk) 01:24, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge - good job on improving the sourcing cab! -- Whpq (talk) 15:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.