User:Pinkqueen101/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article

Complete your article evaluation below. Here are the key aspects to consider:

Lead section

A good lead section defines the topic and provides a concise overview. A reader who just wants to identify the topic can read the first sentence. A reader who wants a very brief overview of the most important things about it can read the first paragraph. A reader who wants a quick overview can read the whole lead section.

Does the lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
Does the lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
Does the lead include information that is not present in the article? (It shouldn't.)
Is the lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Content

A good Wikipedia article should cover all the important aspects of a topic, without putting too much weight on one part while neglecting another.

Is the article's content relevant to the topic?
Is the content up-to-date?
Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?
Does the article deal with one of Wikipedia's equity gaps? Does it address topics related to historically underrepresented populations or topics?

Tone and Balance

Wikipedia articles should be written from a neutral point of view; if there are substantial differences of interpretation or controversies among published, reliable sources, those views should be described as fairly as possible.

Is the article neutral?
Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
Are minority or fringe viewpoints accurately described as such?
Does the article attempt to persuade the reader in favor of one position or away from another?

Sources and References

A Wikipedia article should be based on the best sources available for the topic at hand. When possible, this means academic and peer-reviewed publications or scholarly books.

Are all facts in the article backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
Are the sources current?
Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors? Do they include historically marginalized individuals where possible?
Are there better sources available, such as peer-reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random websites? (You may need to do some digging to answer this.)
Check a few links. Do they work?

Organization and writing quality

The writing should be clear and professional, the content should be organized sensibly into sections.

Is the article well-written - i.e. Is it concise, clear, and easy to read?
Does the article have any grammatical or spelling errors?
Is the article well-organized - i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

Images and Media

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?
Are images well-captioned?
Do all images adhere to Wikipedia's copyright regulations?
Are the images laid out in a visually appealing way?

Talk page discussion

The article's talk page — and any discussions among other Wikipedia editors that have been taking place there — can be a useful window into the state of an article, and might help you focus on important aspects that you didn't think of.

What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?

Overall impressions

What is the article's overall status?
What are the article's strengths?
How can the article be improved?
How would you assess the article's completeness - i.e. Is the article well-developed? Is it underdeveloped or poorly developed?

Examples of good feedback

A good article evaluation can take a number of forms. The most essential things are to clearly identify the biggest shortcomings, and provide specific guidance on how the article can be improved.

Peer review of this article about a famous painting

Which article are you evaluating?

2025 Unrivaled Season

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?

I love college basketball, especially women's college basketball. I got super into it around last year. When many of my favorite players went to the WNBA, I continued to follow them there. During the off-season, a new league for 3x3 basketball was created. Many of the most popular players in the WNBA chose to participate in the Unrivaled league. This league is still very new, this is its first season. When I found this article, its talk page was empty. The article is also ranked C class. The article’s ranking and empty talk page show a lack of people working to improve this article.

Evaluate the article

The Wikipedia article titled "2025 Unrivaled season" provides an overview of the inaugural season of Unrivaled, a 3-on-3 women's basketball league co-founded by Napheesa Collier and Breanna Stewart. The league's first season commenced in January 2025, featuring six teams based in Miami, Florida.

The lead section effectively introduces the topic by stating that the 2025 season is the league's inaugural season. It mentions that six teams will participate in a regular season from January to March, competing for four playoff spots. This concise introduction provides readers with a clear understanding of the article's subject. However, the lead could be enhanced by briefly outlining the major sections of the article, such as team information, season structure, and notable events, to give readers a roadmap of the content. Additionally, ensuring that all information in the lead is expanded upon in the main body will maintain consistency and prevent the inclusion of details not present elsewhere in the article.

The article covers relevant aspects of the 2025 Unrivaled season, including the league's founding, team details, and season schedule. It mentions that the league was founded on July 6, 2023, by Napheesa Collier and Breanna Stewart, aiming to provide a domestic offseason opportunity for WNBA players, so there would be more opportunities. Before this league, WNBA players who wanted to play in the offseason had to go overseas. The six teams—Laces BC, Lunar Owls BC, Mist BC, Phantom BC, Rose BC, and Vinyl BC—are all based in Miami for the inaugural season. The article notes that the regular season runs from January to March 2025, culminating in playoffs to determine the league champion.

While the article provides a foundational overview, it lacks detailed information on several key aspects. Some of the main aspects missing are season highlights, league structure and rules, and equity structure and inclusion efforts. Information is absent regarding significant games, player performances, and milestones achieved during the season. For instance, Napheesa Collier's outstanding performance, including winning the 1v1 tournament and sharing her prize with the coaching staff, is a notable highlight. Details about the league's format, such as game rules, point systems, and playoff structures, are not discussed. The article does not address how the league contributes to addressing equity gaps in sports or its impact on historically underrepresented populations. Incorporating these elements would provide a comprehensive view of the season and enhance the article's depth.

The article maintains a neutral tone, presenting factual information without bias. It refrains from making subjective claims or favoring any team or player. However, the current content is limited in scope, due to it being the first season, and as more detailed information is added, it's crucial to continue presenting all viewpoints fairly, especially when covering competitive aspects and any controversies that may arise.

The article currently cites foundational sources, such as the main Wikipedia page for the Unrivaled league. To enhance credibility and provide a more thorough account of the season, the article should incorporate additional reliable sources, such as official league announcements, reputable news outlets, and diverse perspectives. Press releases and official statements from the Unrivaled league's website can offer authoritative information on league operations, schedules, and partnerships. Coverage from established sports news organizations can provide insights into game results, player performances, and significant events. For example, articles detailing Napheesa Collier's success and the league's impact are valuable additions. Including sources authored by individuals from historically marginalized communities can offer varied viewpoints and enrich the article's content. Ensuring that all facts are backed by reliable secondary sources will enhance the article's accuracy and trustworthiness.

The article is currently brief, with a basic structure. As more information becomes available, organizing the content into well-defined sections will improve readability. Due to the Unrivaled League being in its first season, there is a lack of information, but as more and more seasons occur, the article needs to continue to stay organized. Some suggested sections can include: Introduction, League Formation and Objectives, Teams and Rosters, Season Structure, Notable Events and Highlights, Media Coverage and Partnerships, Impact and Reception, and so much more. Ensuring clarity, conciseness, and proper grammar throughout the article will enhance its professionalism and accessibility.

The article currently lacks visual elements. Incorporating images can significantly enhance reader engagement and understanding. The article should add team logos, uniforms, action shots of the players, etc.