Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Wright (author)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 03:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Martin Wright (author) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No references to support notability, nor even a claim thereof. Possible autobiography. Doesn't meet WP:CREATIVE. Subject has one published book, also of no clear significance. Disclosure: mine is the anonymous IP account that nominated this for speedy deletion. I think it still merits speedy. JNW (talk) 04:09, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:02, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails all notability criteria for WP:CREATIVE and WP:BIO. Only reference in the article is for an on-line resume which itself reveals no assertion of notability. A search for significant coverage [1] [2][3] finds nothing outside of Wikipedia mirrors. — CactusWriter | needles 06:05, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per CactusWriter.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 01:51, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - His one book is possibly a WP:HOAX and certainly non-notable per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scions of Eden. — CactusWriter | needles 10:44, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is neither independent notability nor reliable third-party resources Rirunmot (talk) 23:35, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per everyone. Edward321 (talk) 13:43, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.